Search blog.co.uk

  • My analysis of Atlas Shrugged

    I have been inactive for a long time now. Partly because Atlas Shrugged has taken me ages to finish and partly because of real life stuff. Here is an analysis of the parallels between the book and the Illuminati, as it is supposed to be a code for the Illuminati's plan.

    Atlas shrugged may soon be a film with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Other analyses of Atlas shrugged

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_shrugged - Wikipedia (of course)
    http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/atlasshrugged/ - for education
    http://www.illuminati-news.com/2007/0322a.htm
    http://kt70.com/~jamesjpn/articles/atlas_shrugged.htm - An analysis from John Todd. John Todd is a former high level witch who converted to Christianity and now lectures on the occult and the Illuminati.

    Terminology:

    Producer: Someone who produces things of value through the power of the mind or through hard work. John Galt is a producer because he invented a free energy motor. Dagny Taggart is a producer who expanded the railway system. Hank Readan is a producer who produced his own brand of metal.

    Striker: Producers who decide to no longer lend their services to people who repay them with hatred and resentment. They all live in Galt's Gulch a hidden self sufficient valley in Colorado.

    Looters: People who take the Producer's inventions and products through force.

    Moochers: People who make the producers guilty for their success in order to get money from them.

    Mystic: Someone who has given up on the reason of his or her mind and gets messages from some other source. Mysticism is a bad thing to the objectivist philosphy as it flies in the face of reason. It is similar to the philosphy of the Moochers.

    Technology

    Reardan metal: Probably from a UFO.

    Project X: similarity between that and HAARP. According to Ben Fulford, HAARP caused an earthquake which damaged a Japanese nuclear power plant after he made his ultimatum.

    http://www.projectcamelot.org/benjamin_fulford.html
    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/271203iranearthquake.html - Iran earthquake triggered by HAARP?
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19778870/ - news report of earthquake.

    An illusion of a mountain in Colorado: This was mentioned in a google video where someone gave a lecture starting with the use of 666 in advertising, then moved onto Atlas Shrugged. I can’t remember the name and didn’t write it down, dammit! If anyone knows it or finds it, please tell me!

    Galt’s engine: A lot of people are researching free energy. The latest group is the Orion project. Other people know the theory. Free energy mentioned in the book, by taking electricity from static in the air is not a usual method.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_point_energy#.22Free_energy.22_devices
    http://www.free-energy.ws/

    Industries mentioned:

    I have listed the industries mentioned in Atlas Shrugged and looked at the below website to see if the Illuminati own similar industries. They do own these and many more. There are also many other people who own similar industries and there are many more industries that the Illuminati own that aren’t mentioned in the book.

    http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_satanic_bloodlines.htm

    Rail: I couldn’t find the rail industry there. Maybe I didn’t look hard enough.

    Banking: Rothschild (banking + Reuters + Federal Reserve)

    Law: Bundy family.

    Oil: Rockerfeller owns Standard Oil and sold Hitler oil. Van Duyn family own a petroleum company.

    Steel: The Van Duyn family own a steel mill in Turkey. Reynolds family own United States Steel Corp.

    Motor: The DuPont family absorbed General Motors.

    Copper: The Reynolds have a Reynolds metal company.

    Galt’s Gulch:

    Everything costs something. Galt explains why people have to pay for things in his speech. He says that you pay the minds who created it.

    Money is central: Rothschild motto – if you control money, you control the world. Henry Kissenger, who worked for the Illuminati.

    Money is in gold – similar to what the Illuminati did during the great depression when they seized all the gold.

    The cost of stuff is extremely low. John pays Dagney $10 a month to work as housekeeper. John Galt’s lectures cost $2 each. Nothing else costs more than a quarter. However, since everything the producers earn is not taxed or looted, they are happy because everything they produce is theirs and theirs alone.

    It’s self sufficient and hidden by an illusion.

    The last days:

    The most extreme events take place 12 years after John Galt left the 20th Century Motor Company. 12 years after John Galt leaves the 20th century? Wouldn’t that be early 2013? The year may be significant.

    In the first two thirds of the book, there are hints that industry is slowly falling apart. In the last third of the book, the country is falling apart. All the producers have left civilisation, save Dagny. The people left in charge- the Looters – are not able to keep the country together, since their philosophy involves feeding off the producers. Instead, militant factions form and fight for control and the government starts some extreme measures.

    On September 11th (interesting), Dr Robert Stadler, a former teacher of John Galt who is now his enemy makes a speech. In it, he says that ‘Thinking must be left to the professionals.’ It’s his way of stopping people thinking for more power.

    Later, it got so bad that all people over 65 and a third of babies under 1 have to be killed. This law was passed when the Looters had captured John Galt and were torturing him, so he could give them orders.

    Comparisons between the Strikers and the Illuminati

    They both have an illusionary mountain. They both have places they can hide.

    They both plan on hiding away while society is destroyed.

    They both own a lot of businesses between them (see Illuminati business parallels above).

    The producers speak this oath before joining Galt’s group:

    I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine. – John Galt.

    The real Illuminati have monarch programmed slaves - http://www.emhdf.com/Monarch-mind-control.pdf

    I doubt they truly follow Galt’s oath.

    The Striker’s in Atlas shrugged are made out to be a persecuted group, whereas the Illuminati of this world seem to be the persecutors. The Strikers obtain wealth by their hard work and by producing value. The Illuminati have subjugated millions of people by bringing about depressions and extending wars for their own profit and power.

    According to Ayn Rand, the collapse of civilisation will be brought about just by the people who produce removing themselves from society. However, the Illuminati seem to feel the need to build underground bases and bring about their own disasters to reduce the world population for more control. I think this is a sign that we definitely do NOT need these people. They own a lot of the shops and services that they own and that we depend on, but they are far from Galt’s dream.

    John Galt’s speech

    In the last third of the book, John Galt makes a speech which lasts 3 hours and covers 56 pages. Through this speech, Ayn Rand explains her philosophy of Objectivism. Rand’s philosophy is elaborated on in other books.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_%28Ayn_Rand%29

    Sacrifice is a bad thing. He defines sacrifice:

    "'Sacrifice' does not mean the rejection of the worthless, but of the precious. 'Sacrifice' does not mean the rejection of the evil for the sake of the good, but of the good for the sake of the evil. 'Sacrifice' is the surrender of that which you value in favor of that which you don't.

    "If you exchange a penny for a dollar, it is not a sacrifice; if you exchange a dollar for a penny, it is. If you achieve the career you wanted, after years of struggle, it is not a sacrifice; if you then renounce it for the sake of a rival, it is. If you own a bottle of milk and gave it to your starving child, it is not a sacrifice; if you give it to your neighbor's child and let your own die, it is.

    A sacrifice is the surrender of a value. Full sacrifice is full surrender of all values. If you wish to achieve full virtue, you must seek no gratitude in return for your sacrifice, no praise, no love, no admiration, no self-esteem, not even the pride of being virtuous; the faintest trace of any gain dilutes your virtue. If you pursue a course of action that does not taint your life by any joy, that brings you no value in matter, no value in spirit, no gain, no profit, no reward—if you achieve this state of total zero, you have achieved the ideal of moral perfection.

    John Galt says that his enemies’ philosophy involves them forcing the producers to sacrifice their value so that they may survive.

    "You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man's sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster. In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty.

    According to John Galt, there are two enemies to the producers. Those who are also referred to as mystics, who claim that there is some kind of greater power that we can’t conceive which gives them their power and those who take power by force.

    "For centuries, the battle of morality was fought between those who claimed that your life belongs to God and those who claimed that it belongs to your neighbors—between those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of ghosts in heaven and those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of incompetents on earth. And no one came to say that your life belongs to you and that the good is to live it.

    "Selfishness—say both—is man's evil. Man's good—say both—is to give up his personal desires, to deny himself, renounce himself, surrender; man's good is to negate the life he lives. Sacrifice—cry both—is the essence of morality, the highest virtue within man's reach.

    John claims that nothing is free and that there is no such thing as entitlement, because everything we have has been a result of many peoples’ hard work and intelligence. People who claim that they are entitled to this are basically looters:

    They proclaim that every man born is entitled to exist without labor and, the laws of reality to the contrary notwithstanding, is entitled to receive his 'minimum sustenance'—his food, his clothes, his shelter—with no effort on his part, as his due and his birthright. To receive it—from whom? Blank-out. Every man, they announce, owns an equal share of the technological benefits created in the world. Created—by whom? Blank-out. Frantic cowards who posture as defenders of industrialists now define the purpose of economics as 'an adjustment between the unlimited desires of men and the goods supplied in limited quantity.' Supplied—by whom? Blank-out. Intellectual hoodlums who pose as professors, shrug away the thinkers of the past by declaring that their social theories were based on the impractical assumption that man was a rational being—but since men are not rational, they declare, there ought to be established a system that will make it possible for them to exist while being irrational, which means: while defying reality. Who will make it possible? Blank-out. Any stray mediocrity rushes into print with plans to control the production of mankind—and whoever agrees or disagrees with his statistics, no one questions his right to enforce his plans by means of a gun. Enforce—on whom? Blank-out. Random females with causeless incomes titter on trips around the globe and return to deliver the message that the backward peoples of the world demand a higher standard of living. Demand—of whom? Blank-out.

    Conclusion

    If Atlas shrugged is the Illuninati’s plan in fiction, then their view of themselves seems very far from reality. The Strikers are portrayed as the people who uphold civilisation with their minds and their industriousness. They live by the oath:

    I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine

    The Illuminati in real life have no qualms about starting depressions, wars, earthquakes and epidemics to achieve their aims.

    They want to cause the collapse of civilisation and cause huge population reduction to gain control. In the book, the Strikers go on strike because they are sick of being exploited, but in this world, it is the Illuminati who are the exploiters. I’m sure they would love for the government to start killing people in the name of saving food. They would love forcing people against each other. In the chaos they cause, they will return to bring order.

    Part of me thinks that Ayn Rand may have coded a message for the rest of us. Maybe the Illuminati are represented by the looters and the moochers and that the producers are the people they exploit. There must be many talented people whose potential has been wasted by the subjugation of the Illuminati. Remember the words of John Galt, when he talks about surrendering to the looters and the moochers:

    "But it cannot be done to you without your consent. If you permit it to be done, you deserve it.”

  • The relief of confirmation

    This post features the Illuminati – a group of 13 families including the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds – who want control of every human being on this planet. Here is a website to learn more:

    http://www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm

    Why the title? I have collected a lot of information on UFOs, the Illuminati and other conspiracies, but all the information has come from sites which deal solely in various conspiracies (a word which actually sounds dirty to me. It gives me the image of some paranoid maniac preaching crazy theories to people.)

    It’s an extremely weird feeling to believe in UFOs, aliens walking amongst us, psychic phenomenon and shadowy organisations trying to take over the world and then to walk down to your local town centre and see people shopping, talking eating and drinking. No aliens. No cults. No UFOs It’s like living on two planets, and I don’t feel I can tell anyone about it for fear of being labelled a crackpot conspiracy theorist.

    However, I felt a mixture of shock and relief when, watching the news on the TV, one of the reporters quoted Gordon Brown (the Prime minister of the UK) using the words “New World Order”. This was in India:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6277747.stm

    To me, it was confirmation that these things actually do exist in the real world, and they are not just for the amusement of a group of crackpots. My two worlds had combined. Here was the mundane world’s acknowledgement that there is something going on.

    When you look closer, you realize that the Illuminati are actually hiding in plain sight. The words “New World Order” are on the dollar bill in Latin. The symbol for the federal reserve is actually an Illuminati symbol. The Statue of Liberty is actually Isis. There are symbols and word games everywhere. No one says anything about it. It’s never acknowledged on television or in the media, yet they are standing right in front of us. It’s amazing that the Illuminati has managed to become simultaneously omnipresent and yet completely invisible. People see their symbols every day and yet never question or research their meaning. They just accept them. People believe the news when they are told that aircraft caused the Twin Towers to fall, yet their destruction looks like a controlled demolition.

    http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

    And yet, if I presented the vast amount of eyewitness testimonials on UFOs to most people, or asked them to consider a different view of history, then I would be the one who would be labelled a crackpot.

    If the Illuminati is real, then these people are very effective at what they do.
    I’m going now – I’m making my way through Atlas shrugged – apparently the Illuminati plan presented as a novel. I’ll talk about it later.

  • Is all fiction, fiction?

    No blog post for over a week! I got a bit overwhelmed by all the information and decided to stop for a bit. However, I have looked at stuff, but I haven't been so rigorus in logging it.

    I have brought the first Montauk project book from Amazon. I'm just reading it.

    The next book I am going to read is called Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. I heard about this book on a video on google video. I wish I could remember the title. However, the lecture talked about the number of times 666 appeared in advertising and that many major companies always place their officces in the 666th building on a particular streer. and how Washington's street map has several illuminati patterns in it. There are also several other illuminati symbols all over the place. For example, the pyramid with an eye on the dollar bill is an illuminati symbol.

    Route 666 in America is also significant.

    So why Atlas shrugged? Apparently it is fact released as fiction. If the book was released as nonfiction, it wouldn't have been released. Apparently Gallileo released his work as fiction to avoid the wrath of the church. Atlas Shrugged is a story of the Illuminati's plan basically, and Illuminati members have an expensive copy of this book on their coffee tables as a signal to any visitors.

    According to Richard Hoagland (http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm) and David Wilcock (http://www.projectcamelot.org/david_wilcock.html) Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey and 2010: Odyssey 2 contain factual elements. There was an electromagnetic anomoly on the moon and humans are trying to convert gas giants into stars. They attempted it on Jupiter in 2003. They flew a satellite into Jupiter to destroy it and to detonate its plutonium fuel rods. A large black spot appeared on Jupiter, but it did not set off a chain reaction which turned it into a star. Nasa may try the same with the Cassini Hugens probe which is currently collecting data about Saturn's moons (http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/lucifer-project.html)

    A date I have heard is July 7th 2008. If you look up the Cassini probe on NASA's website, they will give you a date by date account of what it will be doing, finishing on June 30th.

    This is significant, because if Saturn becomes a star, it will release a load of radiation and high energy particles to Earth. People will go into those underground bases we've heard so much about, while the rest of us on the surface will be decimated. This may be the disaster the Illuminati wants.

  • How to tell what is disinformation and why all information is fuzzy

    Just a quick post (I say that to myself every time) about spotting disinformation. I'll use the example most well known to me. That is Serpo (www.serpo.org). I also remember it, because serpo was the first website I looked at about government conspiracies and UFOs. That site led me to www.projectcamelot.org which led to everything.

    Serpo is apparently the name of a planet in the Zeta Reticuli star system, inhabited by a race called Ebens.

    Bill Ryan originally ran the site where several releases were made by an anonymous source to both him and a journalist called Victor Martinez.

    Bill has given several intervews, found on the website, saying that he believes that Serpo is a mixture of disinformation and truth. Below is a very interesting interview with Jerry Pippin where as well as analysing the Serpo story, they also analyse the nature of conspiracy stories and disinformation:

    http://jerrypippin.com/audio/Serpo%20Pgm%20201.mp3

    I have not read the SErpo releases word for word. The sheer volume of material put me off - I like clear simple answers to simple questions. Hearing that a lot of it was disinformation did not encourage me to read it. However, this is a good exercise in how to tell what is disinformation and what is not. Serpo may have started off as a genuine disclosure, but then the government may have got in on the act. The following things made it easy.

    1) The source was anonymous. Anyone could have pretended to be the anonymous source.
    2) There probably was more than one person, but they all came from the same organisation, meaning that there was only one source. There was no corroboration.
    3) The source communicated via email in his or her own time. This meant that the source could think up an answer that was consistent with all the previous information (and the source knew all the previous information because they had released it themselves. If there was more than one source, they could have read the other information on the website.) A good trick would have been to withold some information and ask something about that. Bill or Victor may have tried that.
    4) The source was able to lay down any conditions he or she wanted. If they were not met, they would no longer disclose information.
    5) The disclosures were long and rambly with spelling errors, making them hard to read and full of useless information. A person like Bill Ryan, who seems to me, to look at every word and every detail, just in case there is a slight discrepancy must have taken a phenomenal amount of time to analyse the data. MAybe they were trying to wear him down.

    None of this makes Serpo disinformation. It just makes it very easy for people to disinform.

    Project Camelot does face to face interviews with selected people. This makes it easier to catch out disinformation:

    1) There is a wide range of people - they can seek out corroboration and/or differences between peoples' stories.
    2) They know who they are talking to and so know the history of these people (in most cases)
    3) The interviews are real time and face to face. this means that we can see the interviewees' reactions and the interviewer can ask a few 'oddball' questions that someone who is lying may not have thought about in advance. For example, one interviewee said that he had seen a grey alien, so they asked him how many fingers it had. His answer was that he honestly didn't look.
    4) If an interviewee started getting rambly, I'd probably switch off.

    So Project Camelot interviews have a lot more defenses against disinformation. Except of course, unless the interviewee has been disinformed themselves, in which case they believe they are telling the truth, but are passing on lies. This makes them a whole lot more believeable.

    Like Bill Ryan in his Jerry Pippin interview, even though I have looked at a lot of information (though nowhere near enough), I am not 100% certain about much of it. Bill Ryan says that a high up intelligence person told him that all disclosure will be open to an alternative explanation because the government or whoever rules us believes that undeniable proof will put a lot of people in shock and cause chaos. So it has to be fuzzy. I believe that they don't give people much credit and that most people could handle the truth. And that is one reason why I do this blog.

    All this mixed together means that finding the truth is a long and arduous process. But we must persevere if we are to find it.

  • Getting the word out and War of the Worlds

    Note: I am copying and pasting this blog on other blog sites. Other people are starting to give me their own research to go into. I will keep you posted with their links from now on.

    I intend to post this blog on as many sites as possible in order to reach as many people as possible. I believe that everybody needs to know, if not for the truth, then because a lot of people are predicting some major catastrophic events that may start as early as 2009. A shortlist, I can think of:

    Boriska, an indigo child in Russia predicts catastrophic events from 2009-2013

    http://www.projectcamelot.org/boriska.html

    Dan Burisch states that greys (the typical name for short, grey aliens with large heads and eyes. Think ET, but not very nice.) have given us technology which will eventually cause a catastrophe on December 21st 2012. (EDIT: 12th changed to 21st - typo.)

    http://www.projectcamelot.org/dan_burisch.html

    Phillip Schneider, in his final lecture states that governments are building underground bases to preserve humanity.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b5Ea3dgK3c

    A film states that a dark star or brown dwarf known as Nibiru will be coming closer to Earth and causing problems.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lh_qTnn3omc

    It is not on this film, but there is a film that says that Nibiru was detected in 1983. I did a search on the NASA website and just found a statement saying 'Nibiru is a hoax.'

    Finally, some clues to what is really happening actually do get into the mainstream media. Here is a BBC article on the Svalbard Global Seed Bank, which is an underground vault designed to hold seeds from all the world's plant species:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4605398.stm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault

    According to projectcamelot's latest interview with Richard Hoagland, a well known scientist has told them that between 2009 and 2013, three things will happen to Planet Earth:

    1) Coronal mass ejection from the Sun will hit Earth.
    2) Pole reversal wil start.
    3) Eventually, there will be complete pole shift.

    If nothing else, I have been told that these effects will completely fry any electronic equipment (If you want to save your equipment, I remember reading that you have to wrap it in foil and bury it in a metal box)

    I need to mention that the predictions are not all bad! David Wilcock and many others believe that on 21st December 2012, members of humanity who have served others 51% of the time will 'ascend'.

    http://www.projectcamelot.org/david_wilcock.html

    As usual, I have only given you the tip of the iceberg, so you can do your own research, but I have also written this blog to make a point.

    I want to get to the truth and share it. However, the reason why I'm running around the internet looking at obscure websites for information and not just turning on the news and hearing it is because the people in charge (I use the phrase 'people in charge' because our elected representatives may not necessarily be in charge) believe that complete disclosure that aliens are real and that a disaster will hit the Earth as early as 2009 will cause a mass panic and the collapse of civilisation.

    How did they come to this conclusion? Some people say that they did a test on the public. And that test was Orson Well's 1938 radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_%28radio%29

    Many people still may not be able to handle the truth. One reason is that ETs go against a lot of religions doctrine and that destroying peoples' beliefs will cause a collapse.

    However, if you are reading this blog, you have probably come seeking this kind of information out because you are ready for it.

    I believe that there is something going on. I believe that there will be problems in the future. However, I do not feel worried by this. It may sound funny, but I feel inspired. This is for 2 reasons:

    1) I believe that I am finally getting the truth.
    2) I now have a purpose in life.

    I never intended this post to be so long - I just wanted to write a note saying that I am publishing this blog on other sites to spread the word and why this is not in mainstream media. I guess I got sucked in (again!)

    Keep researching people. And post your own findings.

  • Decoy, Distract, Trash (DDT)

    The title of this blog originates from the post at the disclosure project found here:

    http://www.disclosureproject.org/ddt.htm

    My aim is to warn you that there is a load of disinformation out there, some deliberate, some by people thinking that they are telling the truth, but just repeating lies and some is just plain hoax. In order to cut through this, you need to do your homework and try to corroborate everything. Or even better, do your own calculations, if you can.

    Decoy, distract, trash or DDT for short is government strategy to suppress the truth. Their main method of feeding us lies is to start with a seed of truth to make it more believeable, and then to give us the lies (decoy and distract). Anyone whistleblowers who offer the complete truth are ridiculed (trashed)

    A good example that I know of is the Serpo story (found at www.serpo.org). The website was run by Bill Ryan, who is now focusing on Project Camelot with Kerry Cassidy (www.projectcamelot.org).

    The aim of Serpo was to reveal testimonials and government documents about an alien human exchange program which apparently happened in the 60s (very similiar to the film, Close encounters of the third kind). One (possibly more) anonomous government source(s) were feeding this information to a journalist known as Victor, who was passing this on to Bill Ryan for his website.

    Bill Ryan became suspicious that this was disinformation after a while, and eventually stopped looking for this information in order to focus on Camelot.

    What is interesting is that a few people they had interviewed stated that Serpo was disinformation.

    Dan Burisch in Stargate Secrets 2 says that Serpo is the name of a reptile park reversed. Bill Ryan was not on camera when he heard this, but the way he said 'ok' sounded a bit like he was very crestfallen.

    John Lear and Bill Hamilton believes that Serpo isn't true, but that we did have some kind of exchange. Bill Hamilton says that an air force colonel told them that he flew craft on another planet with 2 suns. He also points out problems in the Serpo story, such as the impossibility of having a planet with 2 suns, both of them 1AU (the same distance from Earth to our Sun) away.

    The point is that there seems to be or was an alien-human exchange, but apart from that, the Serpo story is false. I feel quite bad for Bill Ryan, because he sifted through the reams of documents, looking through the details, trying to corroborate them and then he gets told that what he's put years of work in is all a big fat lie and that the Majestic 12 (12 high ranking US officials who direct top secret programs, possibly disbanded and replaced with a group called PI-40) laugh at people like him.

    So there we go. When you do your research, do not completely believe or disbelieve anything. You can be skeptical, but stay open minded. Look for corroboration. Look for data thats accessible, but no one shouts about .For example, there are plenty of articles on the internet which tell us that all the planets in the solar system are undergoing global warming AND there is hard data to back this up. Why is that not on the 10 o clock news?

    For more info on climate change in the solar system, go to:

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/161106suvjupiter.htm

    Finally, I believe that anyone who says 'This is 100%' true is blatantly disinforming. I believe the most genuine people out there are the ones who say 'This is my story. I'm not asking you to believe me. Do your own research.'

    Richard Hoagland has just been interviewed by Project Camelot (www.projectcamelot.org - go one that site and watch ALL the videos.) I believe he sums it up perfectly, when he says:

    'Google is your friend.'

    HEALTH WARNING: UFO research can lead to obsession. No more UFOs for me today. I'm going to concentrate on something normal.

  • Discovery channel is disinformation?

    By chance, I was watching a program about UFOs on Discovery Science. After doing research on the internet into UFOs, it is apparent that these populist UFO programs say completely different things to what organisations such as the Disclosure Project say.

    This program focused on the theory that greys (a typical name for short, grey skinned aliens with large heads and eyes) were coming to Earth to create some alien/human hybrids for some reason. This is not something that anyone from the Disclosure Project or any lesser known UFO information states.

    The program also presented the information and the people in a way that made the idea look mad. They had a historian, who had researched this topic, giving a mad grin. The commentator spoke in a very tongue in cheek way, and the program used phrases such as 'ALIEN SEX!'.

    In contrast, there is a video on the disclosure project website (found at www.disclosureproject.org) where several witnesses give testimonials to what they believe is UFO behaviour. A usual testimonial is, for example, and air traffic controller seeing something on the radar which moves in a way that means it cannot possibly be a human aircraft (It hangs in the sky or does 90 degree turns.) Other testimonials are from military personell or government employees who saw photos or helped build underground bases. All of them appeared quite sane and none of them came up with wild theories to explain their observations.

    It seems that there is a senseationalist layer to UFOs. This makes it easier to dismiss UFOs and ETs out of hand. The guy I was watching it with thought all the people involved were crazy. However, a serious organisation like the disclosure project is not found on any major channels.

    People need to learn to break through this populist rubbish and try to learn the truth through thier own research. They need to give UFOs and ETs a chance. They should take them seriously. It'd ok to be skeptical, but ridculing UFOs out of hand will not lead to disclosure. I have seen interviews on www.projectcamelot.org with Dan Burisch and a document on the disclosure project, called DDT, where riduclue is the government's most powerful weapon against disclosure. If they openly attacked these people with testimonials, then it would give them weight. So instead, they flood the web with disinformation (such as SERPO) and ridule anyone who says anything to do with UFOs. The people need to realise this and start to take UFOs and ETs seriously. This will break down the first barrier to disclosure.

    God, UFO research and a full time job don't really mix. I'll try to keep up with regular posts.

  • People involved with UFOs

    The aim of this blog is twofold. First, it is to summarise the vast amount of info on UFOs and try to pick out fact from disinformation or pure fiction. Second, I want to give good pointers to further your own research into the field. This is to get information to the masses, for if only a small amount of the information is true, the consequences will turn our world upside down. So, here are several people connected with UFOS. Google them, Youtube them and read what they have written. As always, I am never sure of the validity of these cases, but some of it must be true.:

    Dan Burisch: Former Majestic (USA secret organisation which may have worked with UFOs) employee. Was abducted as a child and worked as a microbiologist for Majestic 12.

    David Wilcock: Apparently the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. Studied the Law of One series, which is communicatios from an alien entity called Ra.

    John Hutchinson: May have invented antigravity and many other things (the Hutchinson effect)

    Gordon Novel: Trying to invent free energy.

    Gary Mckinnon: Hacked into NASA and saw a picture of a UFO. The US is trying to extradite him.

    Nikolai Tesla: Many of his papers are still kept secret. His name seems to pop up when talking about things such as energy production and antigravity.

    Dr Steven Greer: Head of The Disclosure Project. He has hundreds of witness testimonials and US Government documents showing that UFOs are real. He is campaigning for the US Government to disclose its secrets.

    Phillip Schneider: A geologist who worked on secret underground bases to preserve humanity. He is now dead, possibly having been assasinated. His lectures are on Youtube.

    There are a few to get you started.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.